Tag Archives: women



Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Verily, I fear for my Ummah such Aimmah (muftis, molvis and sheikhs) who are mudhilleen (men who mislead others).”


The above Haraam picture was published by the MJC in 2015. It is uptil today – 13 Sha’baan 1438/ 10 May 2017 on the website of the MJC. The MJC states the following rubbish:

“The Muslim Judicial Council (MJCSA) was honoured to host Shazrina Binti Azman (Mizz Nina) and the honourable Mufti Menk who accompanied Mizz Nina on her trip to South Africa.”

The above picture clearly shows that Menk and the MJC are fussaaq. They don’t make Hijaab. They take photos. They mingle with women. Imaam Nawawi Rahimahullah has criticized the intermingling of men and women. In Al-Majmoo’, Imaam Nawawi Rahimahullah criticizes intermingling of the sexes. The MJC claims to be Shaafi! Why are they not following their Shaafi Fuqaha?

Furthermore, not only Imaam Nawawi criticizes intermingling of the sexes. Imaam Sheeraazi Shaafi’ee, Imaam Sarakhsi Hanafi, Faqeeh Ibn Arabi Maaliki, Faqeeh Ibn Qudaamah Hambali, Faqeeh Ibn Rajab Hambali, Hafiz Ibn Hajar Asqalaani Shaafi’ee, Allamah Aini Hanafi, Imaam Hattaab Maaliki, Faqeeh Hajaawi Hambali, Ibn Hajar Haitami Shaafi’ee, and many other Fuqaha! The prohibition of intermingling of the sexes is proven by the Qur’aan, Sunnah and Ijmaa’!

But, the MJC are not Shaafis. Menk is not a Hanafi. They are all Salafis pretending to be Hanafis. And many people in Cape Town are no more Shaafis. They are deviated Salafis ‘following’ deviates and Mudhilleen like Menk, MJC, Ninowy, Madina Institute, Taha Karaan, IPSA, Ighsaan Taliep, CTIEC, Darun Naim deviates, Habibia Mosque Soofi-goofies, the deviates of Quds Mosque, Jasser Auda, ICSA, Facebook deviates, The Mass Mawlid clowns, the coons and their ilk!

There is nothing honourable about the Faasiq Menk. Posing with women in a photo! Accompanying Mizz Nina on her trip to South Africa! And so much more Haraam! Who is the Faasiq Menk trying to fool? Let the Mudhilleen wag their tongues and/or their tails against the Ulama-e-Haq. It simply does not bother us. It is Waajib to stay far away from all of these deviates. Heed the Naseehat (advice) before it is too late…..

They are TV-Shayaateen! See picture below:


Deen TV CEO & TV Talk Show Host, Faizal Sayed, President of the MJC, Sh. Irfaan Abrahams, Deen TV CFO, Hassim Jogee, First Deputy President, Ml. Abdul Khaliq Allie and Second Deputy President,Sheikh Riad Fataar

Inna lillaahi Wa Inna Ilayhi Raaji’oon. Ulama taking photos! And then too with TV Fussaaq! It is Haraam to honour Fussaaq! Whilst Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam turned his face away from those who shaved or shortened their beards (less than a fist-length) as appears in the Ahaadeeth, we find the MJC fraternizing with Fussaaq! They can be no doubt that the MJC are Mudhilleen Ulama-e-Soo!

May Allah save us all from the Fitnah of the Mudhilleen!




Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “ Fuhsh (Shamelessness) is not found in anything except that it uglifies it and Hayaa (Shame) is not found in anything except that it beautifies it.

The logo of the Jamiat Fordsburg – deceptively known as ‘Jamiatul Ulama South Africa’or more appropriately the Jamiat of Ebrahim Bham, who recently participated in the Haraam Kufr funeral service of Kathrada, appears on a poster in some shops advertising a very shameless event in the name of Deen.

Do these so-called Moulanas and so-called Muftis of the Fordsburg Jamiat know anything about Hijaab/Purdah? It seems as if they don’t know. The majority of the Muslim Public enjoy Haraam ‘fun’ events like ‘walks’ or ‘braais’ in the name of Burma, Syria, Rohingya, etc. For a better understanding, we present some quotes from the Fiqh Kitaabs which would Insha Allah be beneficial for all of us:

  • “… undoubtedly women have been ordered with qaraar fil buyoot (to stay always at home) and they have been banned from khurooj (emerging from the home) because there is fitnah in khurooj.” (Mabsoot)
  • “And most certainly they (women) have been ordered with qaraar fil buyoot (to stay always at home) Allah Ta`ala says: (And remain firmly to your homes)” (Sharah As-Siyarul Kabeer – 1:136)
  • “ The Fuqaha have unanimously agreed (enacted Ijmaa`) that indeed there is no concession for Ash-shawaabb to emerge (khurooj) for Jumu`ah, Eidayn and Any Salaah because of the statement of Allah Ta`ala: (And remain firmly to your homes)’ And the command of qaraar (remaining steadfastly at home) is a prohibition of roaming/travelling/parading around and on the grounds that their khurooj is indisputably a sabab (means) of fitnah. And fitnah is haraam and whatever leads to haraam is also haraam!!!

(The term ash-shawaabb means young women, and ash-shawaabb are not confined to teenage girls. All those females who are not aged hags and who hold sexual attraction come within the scope of ash-shawaabb.)

(Check Badaai-us Sanaai – 1:275, 2:331 – Maktabah Rasheediyyah)

It should now be clear that for women to emerge from their homes for a ‘funwalk’ or a so-called fund-raising ‘walk for humanity’ is not permissible. It is Haraam and shameless to participate in such walks. In fact, much intermingling of the sexes takes place at these type of walks. The talk of separate routes is deception. The following quote from CII will give you an idea of how corrupt the Fordsburg Jamiat is:

“An Naasiraat, meaning The Helpers, was formed in 2003 with the help and guidance of Ml Yusuf Patel and Ml Mohammed Ali of Jamiatul Ulema Mpumalanga. An Naasiraat are currently the only Women’s forum that are affiliated to the Jamiat.”

Yusuf Patel and Mohammed Ali of Middelburg are two Shaitaans of SAUF! They lure women out of their homes for reasons not acceptable according to the Shariah! These corrupt Jamiat Molvis are murdering the Hijaab system. Mufti AK Hoosen has thus correctly called Yusuf Patel a Kalb (dog). In fact, if ml Patel is a real Aalim, he will openly tell the whole world that he is worse than a dog! According to some Ulama such as Mufti AK and others, these Jamiat Fordsburg Molvis, Radio Islam and Sanha are Scholars for Dollars. Below we present to you an article written by a Moulana regarding the ‘Walk For Humanity’ event.

Walk For Humanity–An un-Islamic Walk

walk for humanity

(20 Rajab 1438/18 April 2017)

The above poster is advertising a walk which is held by An-Naasiraat (women’s community forum) and supported by Jamiatul-Ulama Fordsburg. It is undoubtedly sad to witness how far away from the way of the Sahaabiyaat the women of today have drifted. In fact, a total blind eye and deaf ears have been casted by today’s women regarding the pure lives of the Sahaabiyaat and the importance of the rules of Purdah.

It is indeed lamentable to observe how a Jamiat which consists of Ulama, which are called the Waratha-tul Ambiyaa’ (the heirs of the Ambiyaa’) in the Hadith, are part of such an evil event held for raising funds etc. for countries which are facing droughts, famine and war.

With regards to such Ulama who play a role, take part, support, and advertise such and other similar Haraam and un-Islamic events and walks, the Hadith clearly states:

“A time will soon dawn when the worst of the people under the canopy of the sky will be their Ulama. From them will emerge fitnah, and the fitnah will rebound on them.”

This walk is un-Islamic. What has made these Ulama to go forth in support of an event which is un-Islamic? Among the responsibilities of the Ulama is to bring the masses close to Allah Ta’ala-to link them with Allah Ta’ala. And this will never be accomplished when un-Islamic ways are adopted. The work of the Ulama is to explain to the masses the meaning of Taqwa and how to implement this in their life. The task of the Ulama is to stress upon the women to remain in their homes and observe Purdah, not to call them for a walk in which they will be displayed on the streets for every Tom, Dick and Harry, Ahmad and Yusuf to see them. Why don’t these Ulama ponder and reflect over the end results of such evil events?

The End Results…

The end results of Ulama or any individual Aalim supporting or participating in these type of walks will be that they leave the masses into believing that such walks are permissible and Islamic. They leave the masses into believing that those Ulama who criticize such events and discourage Muslims from participating are extremists and old-fashioned. They leave the masses into believing that Ulama must promote and deal with such contemporary issues in similar ways.

It is not befitting of the Ulama body to support and participate in this event. But it should not surprise anyone, especially those who by now have understood as to which Ulama bodies promote and propagate the Haqq and which propagate Baatil. For it was a member (a Moulana) of the abovementioned (Ulama) organization who participated in the interfaith prayers held at the Kathrada funeral a few weeks ago. Hence, their support of un-Islamic walks etc. shows nothing but no-confidence in their rulings, following and programmes. Remember, such Ulama are not worth following or supporting. (A detailed article regarding Bham’s participation in the Haraam Kufr Kathrada funeral service will soon be published Insha Allah – Jamiat NC)

The Truth Is…

We are sure that our Nabi (Sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) did not organize, nor did he call on the Sahaabah to join him in a walk which would begin from Masjid-e-Nabawi to a 3, 6 or 8kms distance with a separate route for men and women. Rather, Nabi (Sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) resorted to Du’a. The Muslims of that time were in much more difficulties than our current situation. The Kuffaar were always in discussions of wiping Islam from the surface of the earth. Yet, not once was such a walk organized. Never were the Sahaabiyaat called out of their homes and walk in an anti-Purdah way on the streets.

Remember, this Ummah will only see success when success is sought for in a correct, Islamic and Halaal way. Any Haraam way of inviting the Nusrat (Help) of Allah Ta’ala is hopeless. To cry for help whilst adopting a Haraam and/or un-Islamic way will instead of attracting the Rahmat (Mercy) of Allah Ta’ala, draw the Ghazab (Wrath) of Allah Ta’ala. Remember, Allah Ta’ala has Ghairat (self-respect). He dislikes seeing the Ummah seeking His Divine Aid while indulging openly and freely in ways which are un-Islamic, prohibited and Haraam.

Therefore, the only solution to the current tides and currents which have turned against this suffering Ummah is what Nabi (Sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) taught us in his Mubaarak practical life. Before the battle of Badr, it was a small, weak and ill-equipped 313 Muslim soldiers which faced 1000 strong, well-equipped, armed and mighty army of the Kuffaar. Nabi (Sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) made Du’a that night by saying, “O Allah! If this small army of Muslims are destroyed, You will not be worshipped on earth.” He repeatedly, with a sincere heart, made this Du’a. No walk was arranged. No females were called to join where a separate route was arranged for them. No call was made to lace up their takkies. No entrance fee was asked for. No breakfast was sold at the end-point.

Thus, this Ummah was taught by its guide-Nabi Muhammad (Sallallaahu alaihi wasallam)-that Du’a should be made when the Ummah is going through difficult times. Du’a should be made in the privacy of one’s home, instead of calling the women out of the confines of their homes and allow them to parade on the streets for a stupid walk for humanity. Du’a should be made individually, instead of calling the Ummah to walk on the streets and become oblivious of the remembrance of Allah Ta’ala.

There is an increase of such events in which Muslims are invited to attend in order to contribute to Muslims which are in need of assistance. All such events are baseless, un-Islamic and not permissible to attend. If sincerity was the basis, every Ummati would have resorted to private, secret and humble Du’as and contributions. But to display the ‘care’, ‘concern’ and ‘considerations’ Muslims have for less-fortunate Muslims is making a mockery of themselves and senseless. When the Ummah comes back on Salaah and Sunnah then each Ummati will see the quick effect of his/her simple Du’a which he/she will make.

We ask Allah Ta’ala to guide the Ulama of this Ummah so that they can in turn guide the masses towards Taqwa and Tawakkul, Aameen.

Allah Ta’ala commanding women to remain indoors, says in the Qur’aan Majeed:

“And remain resolutely in your homes, and do not make a display (of yourselves) like the exhibition of jaahiliyyah.”

Nabi (Sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) says regarding such women,

“A woman who applies perfume and passes by a gathering is like an adulteress.”

The days of silence are over. It is upon us to speak out the bitter truth and to make Amr bil Ma’roof and Nahi anil Munkar (encourage good and forbid evil). This is the quality with which this Ummat has been sent. And on the basis of this quality is this Ummat praised in the Qur’aan Majeed,

“You are the best nation selected for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong (i.e. make Amr bil Ma’roof and Nahi anil Munkar).”




A: It is Haraam to attend such a program. Read our latest article on the program of the Ladies Ijtima in Laudium as well as our other articles which discuss female emergence. The Lal Qila Restaurant is a venue for Haraam functions and Haraam weddings! Salaamedia is a Shaitaani Faasiq broadcasting organization.



“And (O Women!) remain resolutely in your homes.” (Qur’aan)

The votaries of the 2017 Ijtima have publicized a pamphlet titled ‘Ladies Program’ which would be held at the Ijtima Site. The program comprises of the following:

1) Yaseen Khatam

2) Nasihah/Dhikr

3) Talk & Dua

4) Zuhr & Lunch

The program to be held at the Ijtima site is Haraam for the following reasons:

1) Female emergence from the home for a reason not deemed necessary according to the Shariah.

Attending a program at the Ijtima Site is not a valid program which justifies female emergence. Very soon, the Tabligh Jamaat will suffer when it allows females to attend the Ijtimas with the men. Satanic interpretation of the Nusoos prohibiting intermingling of the sexes will gradually make its way into the Tabligh Jamaat as well. Majority of the Ulama in South Africa of the Tabligh Jamaat these days belong to the Ulama-e-Soo category or the Dumb Shaitaan category. Very few are real Ulama-e-Haq!

2) A Public Venue

The Ijtima Site is a public venue. It is not a home or some concealed venue. We know very well that some morons will abortively attempt to justify this ladies program by stating that Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam specified a day for the women. Yes, Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam specified a day for the women for a Bayaan – not for a Bid’ati type Yaseen Khatam – not for Dhikr – not for Zuhr & Lunch!

Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam held a Bayaan for the womenfolk in a home – not at a public venue on grounds like an Ijtima. The Bayaans were not advertised. There was complete Hijaab. The Ladies Program of the Ijtima’s is not like Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam’s Bayaan! The Ladies Ijtima Program is pure Shaitaaniyyat hosted by Shayaateen!

3) Women not covering their faces!

What has happened to all the strict Sha-raait (conditions) for the permissibility of female emergence all of a sudden? Will women with exposed-faces be allowed there or not? The votaries of the Ijtima know very well that many women will attend the program with their faces exposed, which is Haraam! Despite knowing the reality, they maintain a Dumb Shaitaan-type silence which shows their scant regard for the Shariah’s laws of Hijaab!

We were informed of a similar Ijtima ladies Day for the women of Azaadville several years ago. A foreign student studying at Darul Uloom Azaadville who happened to be in the boarding that day related to us how Darul Uloom Azaadville looked that day. Whilst they were only a few male students at Darul Uloom Azaadville – in their boarding rooms, the Madrasah was filled with females parading the Madrasah rooms, corridors, etc. One may just imagine how it looked. The student even mentioned that many of the female’s faces were exposed. In fact, the student said it was Fitnah! The same Fitnah is observed Qurbaani time at the Darul Ulooms. Without making proper Hijaab, we should dream of success.

It is sad that the Ulama maintain a silence in this regard. We are unaware if Darul Uloom Azaadville still allows women to come to the Madrasah, Qurbaani time. Everyone knows how the women dress up. The girls even speak to the students. Moulana Abdul Hameed does not like this anti-Hijaab and this intermingling of the sexes. He regards mixing of strange men and strange women to be Haraam. In the very first place, women should be banned from coming to the Darul Ulooms. A women’s place is the home as mentioned in the Aayat quoted right at the beginning.

Just imagine how the Ijtima Site will look full of women that day. Those who are hosting this Ijtima ladies programs are really off-track. They are really making a mockery of the Deen. For the women, it is an exciting outing to see how the Ijtima looks like! Is this how short-sighted the Tabligh Jamaat is!!!

4) Women Driving

This is an added factor of prohibition. The arguments presented in defence of female driving are absolutely ridiculous. Females driving cars is a Fitnah! The Ijtima Ulama are making fools out of themselves. They are behaving like the corrupt Bid’atis of Sultan Bahu and Saaberie Chisty who would soon be having a Haraam Fete. The Bid’ati Sultan Bahu faithless Fete is much worse than the Ijtima ladies program, but it is unbecoming for the Tabligh Jamaat to be so short-sighted like the Sultan Bahu morons in this regard!

5) Yaseen Khatam

Can’t the women recite Surah Yaaseen at home? Furthermore, it will be a congregational Yaseen Khatam. This is in emulation of Fussaaq and the lost Bid’atis. In fact, it is a Bid’ah.

6) Zuhr & Lunch

Women should have lunch at home with their husbands and children. The lunch is superfluous. Furthermore, how will the women be performing Zuhr Salaah? Alone or in congregation? Do these Ijtima characters even know the ruling of women performing Salaah with Jamaat???

In brief, this Ladies Ijtima Program is directly in conflict with the Shariah. The Tabligh Jamaat and Ijtima Votaries need to learn the laws of Hijaab from the Ulama-e-Haq as it seems that their own Ulama are jaahil (ignorant) in this regard – hence the Haraam Ladies Ijtima program!

The current Tabligh Jamaat is in chaos. The ghulu’ of the Tabligh Jamaat is beginning to bounce back onto the Tabligh Jamaat. In addition to their ghulu’, the Fitnah of their Haraam so-called ‘Mastooraat Jamaat’ will soon also rebound on them. Already in several places, the women participate in the Haraam so-called ‘Mastooraat Jamaat’ with their faces exposed. The talk of strict Sha-raait (conditions) for the permissibility of females participating in the so-called ‘Mastooraat Jamaat’, is absolute bunkum.

At the end, the Ijtima morons state: “May Allah make the Ijtima an absolute success and accept all efforts.”

How do they expect success when they violate the laws of Allah? Moreover, how do they expect success when they lure women out of their homes for a program which is not at all necessary according to the Shariah!

Their shortsightedness will also overwhelm them very soon. We make Dua that Allah guides them. Ameen

Kindly click on title to download: LADIES IJTIMA PROGRAM



Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said:  “He, who remains silent when the Haqq is trampled upon, is a dumb Shaitaan.”

We thank Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala for enabling us to become aware of the rubbish that was uttered in the name of Deen at the recent 2016 SAUF conference held in Lenasia and hosted by the Shayaateen. The reason we thank Allah is because had this sinister conference of so-called ‘ulama’ not taken place, we would have not known the Shaitaani objectives of a clique which labels itself an ‘ulama forum’!

SAUF stands for ‘Southern African Ulama Forum’. They fear the criticism of the Ulama-e-Haq like hell. That is why they spoke much drivel about difference of opinion, opposing Baatil, etc. at their unsuccessful conference of Baatil. Not a single member of SAUF will ever dare to write to us regarding methodology, Fiqh, or any other issue as they are well aware of the fact that the Ulama-e-Haq will publicly smash their drivel into bits and pieces as the Qur’aan clearly explains:

“But, in fact, we launch the Haqq (truth) upon Baatil (falsehood). So it crushes out the brains of it (i.e. Baatil). Then suddenly, it (i.e. Baatil) vanishes. And Wail (destruction) unto you (Ahle-Baatil i.e. People of Baatil) for what you fabricate (in the name of Deen)”


SAUF wishes to override the Shariah ruling of the Hurmat (prohibition) of women attending the Masaajid. In this regard, the Ulama-e-Haq have written many articles regarding women attending the Masaajid and the Eidgah. It is Haraam for women to attend the Masaajid and the Eidgah. The SAUF coterie is very hypocritical. They speak of Hazrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha, but they deliberately ignore the Fatwa of Hazrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha. Hazrat Aisha Radhiyallahu Anha has said:

‘If Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam knew what the women had innovated after him, he would have prevented them from the Musaajid just as how the women of Bani Israaeel were prohibited’ (BUKHARI)

Now it will obviously be downright stupid to argue and say that women are only discouraged from attending the Masaajid when the above Hadeeth explicitly states prohibition which is one of the many proofs the Fuqaha of the four Math-habs utilize as a basis for prohibiting women from the Masaajid! We present to you two Fatwas which execrates the views of the SAUF panelists.

The Fatwa of the Shaafi Math-hab:

According to Allamah Ibn Hajar Haitami Rahimahullah, it is Haraam for women to attend the Masaajid, Eidgah, Shopping malls, etc. He clearly states: “.And, no one will hesitate in prohibiting women (from the Musjid, the Eidgah, the shopping malls, and emerging from the home in general) except a ghabi (moron) who is a jaahil, and who lacks ability in understanding the subtleties of the Shariah …………The correct verdict is categorical Tahreem (i.e. haraam for women to come to the Musjid), and this is the Fatwa. And, this in a nutshell is our (Shaafi’ Math-hab).” (Kifaayatul Akhyaar)

The Fatwa of the Hanafi Math-hab:

Allamah Kaasaani Rahimahullah states: “The Fuqaha have unanimously agreed (enacted Ijmaa`) that indeed there is no concession for Ash-shawaabb to emerge (khurooj) for Jumu`ah, Eidayn and Any Salaah because of the statement of Allah Ta`ala:

 { وَقَرْنَ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ }-(And (O Women) remain firmly in your homes)’ And the command of qaraar (remaining steadfastly at home) is a prohibition of roaming/travelling/parading around and on the grounds that their khurooj is indisputably a sabab (means) of fitnah. And fitnah is haraam and whatever leads to haraam is also haraam!!!” (Badaai us Sanaai)


The arguments of the non-Ulama as well as the opinions of the SAUF coterie will Insha Allah be refuted in separate articles/booklets. The issue of women emerging from their homes has long ago been discussed by the real Ulama and real Fuqaha of the past – not by people such as SAUF who have been declared morons by Hazrat Ibn Hajar Haitami Rahimahullah! See his quote again above.

Their arguments are so ludicrous that the Ulama-e-Haq actually laugh at their academic bankruptcy. They are trying to override the Shariah and they don’t realize that they are directly opposing the Fuqaha who are the authorities of the Shariah. It should be clear that there are no Ulama-e-Haq who are part of SAUF. The above quotes from the Shaafi and Hanafi Math-habs clearly show that SAUF is misleading the Ummah about whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has said: “Verily, I fear for my Ummah such Aimmah (muftis, molvis, scholars and sheikhs) who are mudhilleen (men who mislead others).”

SAUF comprises of Mudhilleen and Insha Allah, every baseless argument of SAUF will Insha Allah be refuted and the following Mudhil-morons of the SAUF coterie will Insha Allah be exposed:

  • Shafiq Jakhura
  • Habib Bobat
  • Zubair Bhayat
  • Nazeer Loonat
  • Shabbir Menk
  • Ayyub Ishaq
  • Ebrahim Bham
  • And other deviates

For those who attended the conference: Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “He who increases the number of a crowd is of them. He who is pleased with an act of the people is a partner in its commission.”

Since it is indisputable that SAUF wishes to lure women into the public domain such as the Masaajid, universities, mall, etc. it is Waajib to refute and stand up against the Baatil which the SAUF coterie is propagating. According to the Shariah, women are not allowed to leave their homes without Shar’i necessity. This alone suffices to explain the Haq. Thus, the Fuqaha utilize Aayat 33 of Surah 33 as a basis for declaring female emergence from the home as Haraam. Thus, the SAUF objective opposes Allah’s command:

“And (O Women) remain firmly in your homes” (Surah 33:33)




Rasulullah (sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) said:  “He who is silent about the Haqq is a dumb Shaytaan.”

The ‘Roggeland Duiwel-land Country Estate/House’ in Paarl has become a venue for much Haraam. The saddest and most dishonourable part of it is that the Roggeland Devil House is operated by Muslims. It is supported by Planet Mercy South Africa which is a Ninowi Bid’ati Shia initiative! Planet Mercy indulges in many Haraam activities in the name of fundraising, etc. It is Haraam to support Planet Mercy.

Concerning Ninowy, we had already written an article regarding this deviate which is available on our website. Furthermore, Deviate Ninowy has Shia inclinations. He is not a valid leader to the Muslim community. He might be a leader amongst the Shias and the Bid’atis – but not for those who follow the Deen. If you follow Ninowy as how he is currently with many corrupt ideologies and beliefs, then note well that you will be misled!

Very soon, the Roggeland devils would be hosting another Haraam merrymaking function which they deceptively dub as “Tala’al Badru Alayna – Eat! Pray! Love!” The “eat-pray-love” designation indicates their corrupt inclinations. What do these devils mean by ‘pray’?

They are undoubtedly Shaytaan’s prey. Hence, they do not have a conscience towards the Deen. It is Haraam piled upon Haraam. What ‘love’ and harmony can there be when we indulge in Haraam events?

 ‘Network Events’ is an organization founded by some devil. The evil events which it propagates in the name of Islam really makes us wonder if they really even know anything about Haraam and Halaal. The level of ignorance amongst Muslims is just too high and Muslims are not prepared to accept the truth. Instead, they look for corrupt Ulama and scholars for dollars who sing to their tune like MJC, SANHA, Ninowy, Taha Karaan, the Madinah Institute, the Fordsburg Jamiat, BMJ, Darul Uloom Pretoria, Ghazali School, Imam Suyuti Institute, CTIEC, IPSA, ICSA, NIHT, VOC, the so-called Islamic radio and TV stations, Mustafa College, Shaafi Institute, the Moslem schools, etc.

The Tala’al Badru function is a Haraam event because of the following:

  1. Habibia Siddique Muslim Brigade: Music is Haraam. Imitating the coons is Haraam. In fact, this faasiq brigade looks like a medley of clowns and coons merely to entertain the fussaaq. The one who initiated this brigade is the devil himself. There is nothing Islamic about this brigade. They dress up like Kuffaar and they are a bunch of miserable Shayateen.
  1. Music: Music is absolutely Haraam. Hadhrat Naafi’ (radhiyallahu anhu) narrates:

“Once when Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) heard the sound of a shepherd’s flute, he placed his fingers in both ears (to block the sound of the music), and he diverted his mount from that path. (As they rode on), he would say: ‘O Naafi’, can you still hear (the sound)?’ I would say: ‘Yes.’ He would then continue riding. Only when I said: ‘I can no longer hear it’, did he remove his fingers from his ears. Then he returned to the road. He then said: ‘I saw Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) doing like this when he had heard the flute of a shepherd.” (Ahmad and Abu Dawood)

      This was the reaction of the devotees of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They could not tolerate the voice of shaitaan. When music dinned into their ears, they literally plugged their ears with their fingers. By what stretch of reasoning and on what basis of shame and honesty can it be claimed that Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had permitted music and singing? He had described it as the voice of shaitaan. He would plug his ears to block the sound of shaitaan’s voice entering his ears.

  1. Tasleema Allie: This is a faasiqah Bid’ati Aunty. It is Haraam for women to speak publicly. All the Fuqaha agree that it is Haraam for a woman to project her voice. Lady presenters are Haraam! This is the way of the Kuffaar – not Islam!
  1. Top Ten Nasheed presenter of VOC (Voice of the Clowns): In Islam, there is no such a thing as top ten Naats or top ten Nasheeds or top ten Qiraats. This is Tashabbuh Bil Kuffaar. Furthermore, professional singing of Nazms is Haraam. And this top ten nonsense refers to these Faasiq professional singers. These Nazms of today are absolutely Haraam. Even the singers have no respect for the laws of the Shariah. Hence, they and their listeners trample upon the laws of the Shariah. The top ten presenter of VOC is also a third-class Faasiq.
  1. Qari Idris Rajab: Another corrupt so-called Qaari. Majority of these Qurraa whom the public bring to South Africa are fussaaq involved in shaving the beard, photography, allowing themselves to be videoed, etc. Naina is also a faasiq munaafiq. These Qaaris have sold the Qur’aan down the drain for the carrion gains of the world.
  1. Aswaatul Madinah Band/Musician: Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said that Music breeds hypocrisy in the heart just as water grows plants! Those who listen to music should make Taubah (repent) that they will never ever again listen to music and ask Allah to remove the hypocrisy from their hearts. Don’t deceive yourself by believing that you are pure if you listen to music. A heart contaminated with music is a hypocritical heart. Hypocrisy is definitely found in those who listen to Music. We fully believe in what Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said.
  1. I’jaaz Nasheed group: Another group of fussaaq. These modern-day Nasheeds are not permissible. They resemble kaafir songs. They resemble the Bid’ati Nazms and Naats of the faasiq Qadri Bid’atis and their ilk. Some even have back-ground sounds like ‘Allah-Allah’ which is pure Nafsaaniyyat. There is no benefit in excuses and Shaitaani tricks to defend these Haraam Nasheeds. The purpose of these background sounds is for entertainment which is Haraam. Many of these so-called Nasheeds and Nazms resemble Bollywood songs and Arabian music! Inna lillaahi Wa inna Ilayhi Raaji’oon.
  1. Women leaving their homes: It is Haraam for women to exit their homes for reasons which are not deemed necessary according to the Shariah such as participating in public events. The Qur’aan prohibits such female emergence. In fact, this event is so evil that it is Haraam for men also to take part. There is absolutely no Hijaab at these fundraising events of Shaitaaniyyat.
  1. The Jilbaab and Niqaab: Even if a woman wears the ‘Fardh’ Jilbaab and the ‘Fardh’ Niqaab, then too it is Haraam for her to leave her home for this event as explained above. However, most women don’t cover their faces. This is indeed very shameless. According to all four Math-habs, even the Shaafi Math-hab, it is Waajib-necessary for a woman to cover her face. Ibn Hajar Haitami mentions the Shaafi Fatwa in his Tuhfah: “YES! She who is certain of the gaze of a stranger (ajnabi) falling on her, for her it is laazim (incumbent) to conceal her face from him, otherwise she would be assisting him towards haraam, thus she would be sinning.” It is obvious that men ‘ogle’ and ‘stare’ at women at these Haraam functions. After all, it is a Haraam function which is meant to attract immoral attention of the opposite sex.
  1. Shameless dressing: Jeans and tops and tops and pants are for the Kuffaar – not for Muslims. Love for Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam demands that we dress up Islamically. The modern-day Abaya reveals the shape of a woman’s body. These Abayas are absolutely haraam for appearance in public. These concerts are meant for the kuffaar. Hence, people will dress up like the Kuffaar at these gatherings.
  1. Intermingling of the sexes: This is a major sin. It is shameless to mingle with ghair-Mahrams or anyone to whom it is permissible to get married to. Intermingling leads to Zina.
  1. Wasting Time in Haraam: This is also a sin. We don’t own life. Life is a trust of Allah. Yet, we waste it in Haraam functions and shameless events. Allah Ta’ala has taken an oath on time. But we are at a loss because of indulging in Haraam functions of this type. Only those who utilise their time fruitfully in the obedience of Allah and encourage people towards good, are successful.
  1. Photos and Videos: This is also Haraam. The ones who will receive the most severe punishment on the Day of Qiyaamah are the one’s involved in pictures and photos.
  1. Zina of the eyes: Looking at ghair-Mahrams of the opposite gender which is Haraam.
  1. Zina of the ears: Listening to the voices of ghair Mahram women. The woman’s voice has the ability of inciting lust and passion in a man’s heart.
  1. Wastage of Money: Those who waste money are the brothers of Shaytaan as the Qur’aan says. On the Day of Qiyaamah, we will be questioned regarding our wealth. How did we earn it? How did we spend it? It is clear that it is Haraam to attend this Shaitaani concert. The tickets sold by Networks SA are tickets to Jahannam.
  1. Futility: Futility wastes time. It does not behove a Muslim to indulge in futility. Kuffaar sport, kuffaar games and merrymaking are not for those who are really concerned about the Qabr, Qiyaamah, The Bridge of Siraat, Jannah and Jahannam. Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “The beauty of a man’s Islam is that he shuns futile acts.” There is nothing exciting in this Haraam concert. It is undoubtedly an evil show and party organized by misguided people.
  1. The Haraam Venue: The venue is evil. This Roggeland does not obey Allah’s laws of Hijaab mentioned in 7 Aayats of the Qur’aan and over 70 Ahaadeeth. Segregation of the sexes is Waajib. They also indulge in Haraam buffets where men and women are mixed. Thus, it is stupid and an insult to intelligence to claim that “Venue: this gorgeous Roggeland Country Estate. The only Halaal Estate in the Winelands. Find out about its rich Islamic Heritage…” It has a Shaitaani heritage. That is why it is able to host evil, shameless and haraam concerts and shows in the name of Deen. Even the weddings it hosts, are absolutely Haraam. These picnics and birthday parties are all Haraam!
  1. Corrupt Madaaris and Masaajid run by Fussaaq: The Madaaris and Masaajid who participate in this Haraam function are indeed signs of Qiyaamah. What can these misguided Madaaris teach the Children? No wonder the Muslim Ummah is so corrupt! They must learn to teach the young ones about Hijaab and Haraam functions. So many laws of Allah are violated at this Eat-Pray-Love Concert of the Devil. But the problem with these Madaaris and Masaajid, is that the laws of Allah are violated even at these Madaaris and Masjid venues which supposed to be Islamic. The Madaaris are treated like kaafir schools. The Masjids are treated like Churches.
  1. Tashabbuh Bil Kuffaar: This event and concert is in emulation of the Kuffaar. It is Haraam to raise funds in this manner. Nowadays, most fund-raising activities are Haraam. 99,9% of all these charity and fundraisers are filled with Shaitaaniyyat, Nafsaaniyyat and several Haraam acts. We have forgotten Allah and we only interested in Haraam parties.
  1. VOC-Voice of the Cape Clowns: It is incumbent for the Muslim public to boycott Voice of the Cape. Don’t listen to VOC. Voice of the Cape is a station which propagates Haraam. They have shia inclinations just like Radio-Shia-786. Radio 786 even plays Music. We want to please Allah, but we break his laws. There are 4 Aayats and over 40 Ahaadeeth to prove that all types of Music is Haraam. This VOC and Radio-Shia-786 are involved in much Haraam. They are amongst the worst devils in Cape Town together with the Madinah Institute, The CTIEC, the MJC and a few other organizations. They are the main cause for misleading the Muslims in Cape Town. The ‘Sheikhs’ and Ulama who support these Radio stations are indeed shayaateen misleading the public.
  1. Misleading the public: The event is described as a ‘Muslim’ event. This is not a ‘Muslim’ event. This is a kaafir event. Any Muslim who fears Allah will not participate in this evil event. Everyone who participates in this Haraam concert is a Faasiq and a Faajir according to the Shariah. Openly sinning in public is Fisq. Don’t be fooled by the miscreants who are organizing such a Haraam event!
  1. Calling people towards Haraam: There is much Haraam already as mentioned above. It is Haraam to invite and encourage people towards wrong and evil. Music is Shaitaaniyyat. These organisers of the Haraam event are devils. The Qur’aan prohibits assisting one another in sin. Thus, it is very evil to say “Join us for a symphony of Nasheed, Qasaid, Naats & more from Sunset to a moonlit sky.” The Night is NOT meant for such Haraam nonsense and for Haraam games and partying.

These Haraam functions of merrymaking and fun will not bring people closer to the Deen. Haraam takes people away from Deen. It takes a person further away from Allah Ta’ala. These Haraam functions invite the wrath of Allah Ta’ala. May Allah guide us towards the truth and may He save us from attending these Haraam functions and events. Ameen.





The Glorious Qur`aan, every Muslim knows, is the Kalaam (Word) of Allah Ta’ala. There is nothing more sacred than the Sacred Kalaam of Allah Ta’ala. It is the Muslim’s highest and dearest object of reverence. Any act which detracts from the loftiness and sanctity of the Qur’aan Majeed is accursed and invites the Wrath of Allah Azza Wa Jal. The Qur’aan Majeed as everyone is aware, has been in this Ummah for over 14 centuries. The institutions of Qiraat and Hifz were initiated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) and continued down the centuries to the present day. The highest grade of Qurrah (Qur’aan reciters) and Huffaaz were produced in millions in the history of Islam. But never in the annals of Islam was the Qur’aan subjected to the nafsaani mockery and shaitaaniyat which the present day evil people parading as learned men and religious guides perpetrate purely for despicable worldly and emotional aims and objects. The incentive of money as prizes is a dastardly evil.

The glory, grandeur and loftiness of Allah’s Word are miserably put up for sale in despicable displays accompanied by a host of evil activities.  Allah Ta`ala states:

“Do not trade My Aayaat for a miserable price.” (Surah Baqarah: 41)

 It is mentioned in the Hadith: “Verily, Allah elevates some people with this Kitaab (Qur’aan), and He disgraces others with it.”) Muslim – Ahmed – Daarimi – Ibn Maajah- Baihaqi)

“If the Qaari recites Qur’aan for the sake of money, there will be no reward for him.” (Shaami – 6: 57)  On the contrary, there is athaab (punishment) for trading the Qur’aan for the miserable price of monetary gain and nafsaani aggrandizement.

Some of the evils which are associated with the Qiraat and Qur`aan competitions are:

  • The Qur’aan is recited as an act of public entertainment.
  • Beardless Qaaris will darken the gathering with their unholy presence.
  • The judges in the competition at times will be clean-shaven – fussaaq of the first order.
  • Then you might also find the presence of the evil shaitaani so-called ‘Islamic’ radios.
  • Picture-making and videoing and maybe even ‘live’ on ITV (Iblees TV) or TV-Shaitaan.
  • Intermingling of sexes usually take place even if there’s “separate facilities”.
  • The Qur`aan will be subjected to mockery and this is what a competition constitutes.
  • Riya (ostentation) and Takabbur (pride).
  • Then such competitions might even be held in the holy month of Ramadhaan.
  • And there might be even female participation whereas a woman`s voice is purdah.
  • The Qur`aan-e-Kareem is recited for the sake of monetary prizes or a few miserable rands.
  • The element of Tashabbuh Bil Kuffaar is conspicuous.
  • Evils as mentioned above are vindicated and promoted in the name of the Holy Qur`aan.

A question we may ask ourselves to evaluate these contests: Do these competitions have any resemblance with the Un-Islamic Hollywood and Bollywood and the other Kuffaar awards (such as MGT-Muslims Got Talent) or not? How does today’s nafsaani competitions by faasiq Qaaris compare with what the Sahaabah did? And did the Sahaabah stage public group events of this nature?

Therefore, Qur`aan competitions are not permissible. It is making a mockery of Allah’s Kalaam. The photography, riya, etc. are added factors of prohibition which aggravate the mockery. The Qur`aan is not for such purposes. The Qur`aan is not for winning worldly and nafsaani prizes and to see who can read better and nicer. The Qur`aan has to create khushu’ and strengthen the bond with the Aakhirat, not the dunya. But in these satanic competitions, the Qur’aan is made an object of public entertainment.


Q: Do the Huffaaz and Qaaris who participated in the Midrand Qur’aan Memorization Competition come within the scope of the following Hadith?

Once Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said to the Sahaabah:”Seek protection with Allah from Jubbul Huzn (The Pit of Grief).”

The Sahaabah said: “O Rasulullah! What is Jubbul Huzn?”

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “It is a valley in Jahannum. Every day Jahannum itself petitions Allah Ta’ala four hundred times to save it (from Jubbul Huzn’s heat).”

Someone asked: “O Rasulullah! Who will enter it?”

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “The Qurraa’ (plural of Qaari) of Riya (show/ostentation), who display their deeds. Verily, the worst of the Qurraa’ by Allah are those who visit the wealthy.” (Ibn Maajah).

A: Yes, these Qaaris come within the scope of the Hadith which you have mentioned above.

In this Hadith a dire warning is sounded to the Qaaris of our era. Qaaris who participate in qiraa’t competitions, who recite for the public to gain money and acclaim are the serfs of the wealthy. Their sights are set on the wealth of people. They recite the Qur’aan Majeed for monetary gain. Most of them are distinguished fussaaq with clean shaven faces or sporting telescopic ‘beards’. They are destined for Jubbul Huzn. It is haraam to attend their qiraa’t sessions, and it is not permissible to organize such qiraa’t competitions and sessions.

May Allah Ta’ala save us all from Jubbul Huzn. Ameen


One of the worst tragedies had taken place last weekend in South Africa. It is much worse than earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, tsunamis, etc. The damage, which this tragedy has caused, is almost irreparable. Thousands of Muslims have in fact publicized that they have thrown away their Islam because of this tragedy. It is the tragedy of the Turkish Masjid – the kaafir Gulen’s ‘musjid’.

The Turkish Masjid has become a venue for the publication and dissemination  of much Haraam. It has been established to undermine Islam. A Masjid is the House of Allah, but it has been treated last weekend and in the past also as a Kaafir style hall! This is how the Gulen’s temple-masjid is being utilized. Practically speaking, the Gulen’s masjid is not for Islam and true Muslims.  Gulen’s masjid is for Fussaaq and for Zombies. It is not for people of the truth. It is just like a ‘church’ which has minaarets. Nothing else.

It is sad to observe that Muslims are silent with regards to the Haraam Hifz competition which took place last week at the Nizamiye Complex in Midrand. We will now highlight all the Haraam acts which took place at the Qiraat competition over and above all the other Haraam acts mentioned on page 1 of this article.

  • A Haraam expo took place at the Nizamiye complex where food, fashion and fun was advertised.
  • A Faasiq group called ‘Ask Nanima’ publicized it. The Ask Nanima gangsters are fussaaq who aggravate the mockery of the Qur’aan. Stay far away from them as Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “When a faasiq is honoured, the Arsh of Allah shudders.” It is Waajib to boycott their functions, programs and their home industry expos. Never ever support them and never ever visit their website. In fact, you should criticize them and condemn their evil. Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar is the obligation of all    They promote a lot of Haraam acts and Haraam products.
  • Ladies Facilities for the competition and expo are Haraam! Women are commanded in the Qur’aan to remain at home. They are only allowed to leave their homes for necessities. Attending expos, Hifz competitions, etc – not only are they not necessities, they are haraam activities, sacrilegious of the Qur’aan.
  • PHOTOGRAPHY – the person who will receive the worst punishment on the Day of Qiyaamah is the one who indulge in picture-making of people and animals. There are numerous Ahaadith severely condemning this act, and there is complete unanimity of the Fuqaha of all Math-habs on its prohibition.
  • The Master of the ceremony was Faasiq, Mudhil, viz. Mr. Menk.
  • The Masjid was like a cinema with a big TV screen.
  • There were photographers right in the Masjid.
  • The Huffaaz that participated were Fussaaq – the type destined for Jubbul Huzn.
  • The Qaaris who participated were Fussaaq. They are Basheer Patel, Ayoob Essack and Rashid Dhabelia. A person who takes photos is a Faasiq. One who participates in evil functions and competitions is a faasiq. Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “When a faasiq is honoured, the Arsh of Allah shudders.”
  • It was like a kaafir-style awards evening or Miss Shaitaanah event held in the House of Allah. The ‘Musjid’ was disrespected and dishonoured. Its sanctity was brutally defiled.
  • The following five Shayaateen ‘graced’ the function as well: VOC – voice of the clowns, CII – Channel Shaytaan, Radio ‘Islam’ (more appropriately, Radio Shaitaan) – The Radio of the Joburg NNB Jamiat (No Name Brand Jamiat), Radio Al-Ansaar (i.e. Radio Ansaarush Shaitaan), The Nasaara Radio Station and ITV (i.e. Iblis television) – the favourite channel of deviates and ulama-e-soo’.
  • Faasiqs such as Anver Surty delivered an address in the Musjid!


An Ahmaq ‘Ifta’ student from one of the Darul Iftas has attempted to defend the haraam Qur’aan competitions by arguing that hosting a Qiraat Competition and giving prizes to the best readers would be permissible. It will not be considered to be copying the Kufaar as a precedent if it is found in the competitions that the Sahabah Radiyallahu Anhum engaged in. However, it should be added that in the manner in which the competition is hosted and the prizes that are given, any emulation of the Kuffaar must strictly be avoided.”


  • We have presented many reasons above why a Qiraat/Hifz competition is not permissible. Qiraat competitions never existed in the history of Islam. There are many evils and Haraam acts associated to Qiraat competitions.
  • As far as prizes are concerned, Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) said: “He who recites the Qur’aan, using it for the acquisition of (worldly gain) from people, will be resurrected on the Day of Qiyaamah with his face as bones bereft of flesh.” (Kanzul Ummaal – Faydhul Qadeer – Mishkaat) The recent Hifz competition held at the Midrand Masjid comes within the scope of this Hadeeth.
  • Then the Ifta student speaks rubbish by saying that it wont be Tashabbuh Bil Kuffaar since a precedent is found in the competitions of the Sahaabah. Firstly, did the Sahaabah have Qiraat competitions? Secondly, Did the Sahaabah stage a public event for their competitions? Thirdly, why is Qiraat competitions only a recent event when the Qur’aan is in this Ummah for more than 14 centuries? Fourthly, The Qur’aan is not meant for Nafsaaniyyat and public shows. The Sahaabah did not compete in good deeds for the sake of worldly prizes and worldly name and fame. Fifthly, what are the precedents and what resemblance does present-day competitions have with the perceived so-called ‘precedents’? There is simply no precedence for the Bid’ah Qiraat and Hifz competitions of Nafsaaniyyat and Shaitaaniyyat!  The Ahmaq has sucked from his thumb falsehood with which he  blemishes the Sahaabah.
  • The Ifta student states that any emulation of the Kuffaar must be strictly avoided. But, these public qiraa’t shows and Qiraat and Hifz competitions are in emulation of the Kuffaar. The organizers of these ‘competitions’ behave like kuffaar. They take photos. Prizes are announced. Women also attend and it is even broadcasted by the Ulama e Soo. Not a single one among the Ulama e Haqq approves these Qiraat and Hifz competitions. Any Sheikh or Molvi who says that the Midrand Hifz competition is permissible, can never be an Aalim of the Haq! Every facet of the accursed competition was in emulation of the kuffaar.

May Allah Ta’ala guide and protect us and the community from the evil and deviation of the mudhilleen parading as ‘ulama’.




The following is an interesting dialogue between a modern lady and an intelligent young girl (15 years) on the purdah topic.

MODERN LADY: Your father is keeping you imprisoned in the four walls of the house. Don`t you feel that you are in a jail?

PURDAH-NASHEEN GIRL: They keep criminals under lock and key in a jail while they keep diamonds and gold in a safe. I am Papa`s diamond which he keeps in this holy sanctuary (the home-safe). Furthermore, a jail is always locked and under guard while our home is open. The prisoner wants to flee from prison. The prisoner is frustrated and full of grief in prison while I am at peace and rest inside our home. The thought of escaping does not arise in my mind. While prisoners cherish the idea of breaking out of prison to gain freedom, I cherish the safety and peace of these four walls of the home. A fish is at rest inside water, not outside.

Women Musjid



Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“The best Salaat of a woman is her Salaat in the innermost recess
of her home.”

Upholding the Prohibition decreed by Hadhrat Umar Ibn Khattaab (radhiyallahu anhu), the Khalifah of the time, Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) said:

“If Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) saw what the women have introduced (by way of mischief), he would most certainly
prohibit them from the Musjid.”


(1) Tabyeenul Haqaaiq, Vol. 1, pages 139 and 140: “They should not attend congregations, i.e. in all Salaats, whether they (the women) are young or old. This is the verdict of the Mutakh-khireen (Fuqaha of the Ahnaaf) because of the rise of fasaad in our times. …….The accepted verdict in our age is prohibition for all (Salaats) because of the change in the times. Precisely for this reason did Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) say: “If Rasulullah had seen of the women what we have seen, then most assuredly he would have forbidden them from the Musjid just as the women of Bani Israaeel were prohibited. Women have introduced (in their lives) adornment, perfume and wearing jewellery. It was for this reason that Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) had forbidden them (from attending the Musjid). The changing of the ahkaam because of the changing of the times cannot be denied, e.g. it is permissible to lock the Musjid in our age (whereas originally this was not permissible).”

(2) Mabsoot of Imaam Sarakhsi, Vol. 16, page 37: “Verily, during the time of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and Abu Bakr (radhiyallahu anhu) women used to attend jama-aat (for Salaat). However, Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) prohibited this, and he was correct (in so doing).”

(3) Al-Ikhtiyaar Ta’leelil Mukhtaar, Vol. 1, page 139: “During our times nothing of it (i.e. whether the women attending the Musjid are young or old) is permissible because of the fasaad of the times and the rampancy of immorality.”

(4) An-Nihaayah: “Our Fuqaha base the prohibition of women attending the Musjid on the prohibition declared by Hadhrat Umar Ibn Khattaab (radhiyallahu anhu). When he discerned the fitnah (mischief) which women had initiated, he forbade their emergence.”

(5) Allaamah Aini (rahmatullah alayh) of the 8th century says: “If Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) could observe the innovations and evils which the women of this age (i.e. the 8th century of Islam) have introduced, her rejection (of women attending the Musjid), would be more vehement. The interval between the era of Aishah’s rejection and Rasulullah’s time is very little. The wrongs which the women during the time of Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) had introduced were insignificant compared to the evils which they have introduced during this age (i.e. the 8th century).”

(6) Al-Muheetul Burhaani: “The Ruling is prohibition for all Salaats because of the spread of fitnah of the age.”

(7) Al-Jauharah: “The verdict (Fatwa) today is prohibition of women’s presence (in the Musjid) for all Salaat because of the prevalence of mischief.”

(8) Munazzal: “The Fatwa today is that it is forbidden for women to attend the Musjid for all Salaats because of the appearance of fitnah.”

(9) Al-Kifaayah: “The Fatwa today is prohibition of females attending (the Musjid) for all Salaats because of the spread of fitnah.”

(10) Mufti Kifaayatullah states in his treatise, The Prohibition of Women Attending Gatherings and Public Lectures: “The Ruling of our Companions is that which the author of Badaius Sanaai has said. In this there is a consensus of opinion that a woman cannot attend Eid or Jumuah Salaat. In fact, she is prohibited from attending any/all Salaat (in the Musjid). This ruling is based on the Qur’aanic aayat: ‘And remain resolutely in your homes…’. The emergence of women from their homes is a cause of fitnah.” It is further stated in Badaai: ‘Women are not allowed to attend Salaat with Jamaat. The proof is in the narration of Hadhrat Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) wherein he prohibited women from emerging from their homes.”

(11) Fataawa Alamghiri, Vol. 1, page 93: “The Fatwa of these times is that it is impermissible for women to attend (the Musjid) for any Salaat because this is an era of social decay and fitnah.”

(12) Bahrur Raa-iq, Vol. 1, page 380: “Women should not attend the Jamaat (Salaat) in view of the aayat: “And remain resolutely in your homes…’ and the Hadith of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) that the Salaat of a woman in the innermost corner of her home is better than her Salaat in the courtyard of her house, and her Salaat in the courtyard of her house is better than her Salaat in the Musjid, and her home is better for her than the Musjid. The author of Kanzud Daqaaiq has mentioned in Kaafi that the Fatwa of this era is impermissibility for women to attend any/all Salaat (in the Musjid) because of the prevalence of immorality.”

(13) Allaamah Badruddin Aini states in Sharah Kanz: “Women, be they young or old, are prohibited from attending the Musjid for Jamaat Salaat because this is an era of social decay and immorality.”

(14) Ad-Durrul Mukhtaar, Vol. 1, page 397: “It is not permissible for women to attend Salaat in congregation, whether it be Jumuah or Eid or a lecture, even if she is old and even if it is night time. This is the final ruling on this issue. Due to the state of immorality, this ruling has been given.”

All the kutub of the Hanafi Math-hab register a firm, resolute uncompromising prohibition on women attending the Musjid for Salaat or for lectures in this era of fitnah and fasaad – evil and immorality of men and women. The Prohibition is based on the Dalaa-il of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. Only morons and immoral liberals of this age deny this irrefutable reality of the Shariah.


It will be prudent to state the Shaafi’ view as well. Miscreants and morons have an evil habit of misleading people by ascribing falsities to the Shaafi’ Math-hab. The Shaafi’ Fuqaha are just as vehement and resolute in prohibiting women from the Musjid as the Hanafi Fuqaha.

(1) I’aanatut Taalibeen, Vol. 2, page 5: “Yes, it is Makrooh (i.e. forbidden) for women of adornment to attend the Musjid with males because of the Hadith in Bukhaari and Muslim narrated from Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) who said: ‘If Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had to see what women have initiated (today), then most certainly he would prohibit them from the Musjid just as the women of Bani Israaeel were prohibited.” And this prohibition is on account of the fitnah in it (in their emergence from their homes to attend the Musjid).
The text of Sharh states: ‘It is Makrooh (reprehensible and forbidden) for a woman to attend Jamaat of the Musjid if she is young even if she dons shabby (unattractive/old) garments, and even if she is not young, but with her there is something of beauty or the fragrance of perfume.’ And it is the duty of the Imaam or his representatives to prevent them (from the Musjid).”

(2) Al-Iqnaa li Shurabeeni, Vol. 1, page 164: “It is Makrooh for the women of beauty (adornment) to attend (the Musjid) with males because of the Hadith of Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) narrated in Bukhaari and Muslim…………..”

(3) Al-Majmoo’, Vol. 4, page 172: “When a young woman or even an old women who can be a cause of lust, intends to attend the Musjid, it is Makrooh for her. It is also Makrooh for her husband or wali to allow her (to attend the Musjid).
If it is such an old woman who is not desirable (i.e. she is not a cause of lust for others) and if there is no mafsadah (fitnah/mischief) either for her or for others, then it is preferable for the husband to allow her if she seeks permission. But if he refuses (to give permission) then it is not haraam for him (to refuse).”

(4) Al-Majmoo’, Vol. 5, Page 13: Explaining the prohibition, it is said: “ …..and because the fitnah and the ways of evil in these times are abundant contrary to the initial era (of Islam).”

(5) Kifaayatul Akhyaar, Vol. 1, page 149: “If Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had to see what women have introduced, he would most certainly prohibit them from the Musjid just as the women of Bani Israaeel were prohibited.’ This then is the Fatwa of Ummul Mu’mineen in the best of ages. Then what should be (the fatwa) in this corrupt time of ours? Verily many others (Fuqaha) besides Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) had also prohibited women from attending the Musjid – others, e.g. Urwah Bin Zubair (radhiyallahu anhu), Qaasim, Yahya Ansaari and Maalik… And this (difference of opinion regarding women’s attendance) applied to that (early) age. But during this era of ours, not a single Muslim will hesitate to prohibit women except a ghabi (an ignoramus/moron whose brains are dense) who lacks understanding of the deeper wisdom of the Shariah. He seeks proof from the zaahiri daleel (i.e. he looks at only the text/the words) without understanding its meaning………….The correct version is resolutely Tahreem (i.e. it is haraam for women to attend the Musjid). And the Fatwa is according to it.”

(6) Haashiyataan, Vol. 1, page 222: “…..the likes of young women of adornment or old perfumed women, and it is haraam for a married woman to go to (the Musjid) without the permission of her husband, and it is haraam for him to permit her because of fitnah from her or on her.”

(7) Bujairmi alal Khateeb, Vol. 2, page 107: “Women should not attend Jamaat (in the Musjid) whether they are young or old because of the spread of fasaad (evil, immorality). …..The fatwa today is on prohibition for all…..This includes (the daily) Jamaat Salaat, Eid, Istisqaa and gatherings of lectures, especially the lecture programmes of the juhhaal (the cardboard muftis and paper molvis) who masquerade as Ulama whilst their motive is carnal lust.”

In the Shaafi’ kitaab, Kifaayatul Akhyaar, Vol.1, page 149, the opinion of morons is vehemently criticized. The author, Ibn Hajar Haitami (rahmatullah alayh) citing the famous Hadith of Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) which constitutes a fundamental basis for the decree of Prohibition, states:
“If Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had seen what women have introduced, then most assuredly he would prohibit them from the Musjid just as the women of Bani Israaeel were prohibited.” (Then he comments): ‘This, then is the fatwa of Ummul Mu’mineen during Khairul Quroon (the Best of Ages – the Age of the Sahaabah). Then what should it be during this corrupt age of ours? (i.e. many centuries after Khairul Quroon with immorality on the ascendancy). Others besides Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) too have stated the prohibition of women attending the Musjid.

Among them are Urwah Bin Zubair (radhiyallahu anhu), Qaasim, Yahya Ansaari, Maalik, and Abu Hanifah once, then at another time he gave permission (for old women during Fajr, Maghrib and Isha). Similarly, Abu Yusuf prohibited it. This (prohibition) with some differences applied to that age (the Khairul Quroon). However, with regard to our age (i.e. the 8/9th century), no one among the Muslimeen will hesitate in (the fatwa) of prohibiting women, except a moron lacking in the understanding of the subtleties of the Shariah. Verily he (the moron) argues (and seeks proof) with the literal text and he applies it literally without understanding its meaning and without taking into account the wisdom (and understanding) of Aishah (radhiyallahu anha). …..And, the Fatwa is on this (i.e. prohibition). And Allah knows best.”

Ibn Hajar Haitami (rahmatullah alayh) has made it abundantly clear that only a moron – a person with a dense brain whose intellectual channels are clogged with stupidity – looks at the text and simply ascribes to it a literal effect in terms of the apparent meaning. He is blind to the many factors and circumstances which fetter the text of the Hadith. The density of his brain precludes the moron from understanding the Fatwa of Wisdom issued by Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) and the wisdom of Hadhrat Umar’s prohibition, and the verdicts of the Mutakh-khireen Fuqaha of all Math-habs.

Ibn Hajar states in his famed Al-Fataawal Kubral Fiqhiyah, Vol. 1, page 204, which we reproduce here for the benefit of all:

Translation: “It is appropriate in our age (i.e. the 8th century) to categorically decree haraam the emergence of young and adorned women because of the abundance of fasaad (mischief/vice/immorality). The factor which made lawful (female) emergence during the Khairul Quroon (the age of Rasulullah – sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Sahaabah and Taabieen) has most certainly disappeared, and also has disappeared (what is mentioned in the Qur’aanic verse): ‘They (women) should not reveal their beauty and they should lower their gaze.” And, similarly is it with the men. The evils of female emergence now is categorical. Then there has been mentioned what Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) said (regarding prohibition of women attending the Musjid)……….And, no one will hesitate in prohibiting women (from the Musjid and emerging from the home in general) except a ghabi who is a jaahil, and who lacks ability in understanding the subtleties of the Shariah …………The correct verdict is categorical Tahreem (i.e. haraam for women to come to the Musjid), and this is the Fatwa. And, this in a nutshell is our (Shaafi’ Math-hab).”
Thus, according to Hadhrat Ibn Hajar Haitami Shaafi’ (rahmatullah alayh) and according to all the Fuqaha of all the Math-habs, the one who calls for women to attend the Musjid, especially in this immoral, libertine age of zina, fisq and fujoor, is a ghabi, a jaahil, one who is dim and dense in the brains and due to these intellectual maladies is unable to understand the deeper meanings of the Shariah.


A Clinching Ruling of the Shaafi’ Math-hab

Ibn Hajar Haitami (rahmatullah alayh), the eighth century authority of the Shaafi’ Math-hab has elaborately presented this Prohibition in Al-Fataawal Fiqhiyatul Kubra. He has argued the case from all angles, and has resolutely confirmed the prohibition for all categories of women on account of the confirmed fitnah. The pandemic of fitnah has been incremental and there is no hope of it receding. Extracts from his lengthy detailed elaboration are as follows:
“With regard to the statement of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam): “Do not prevent the female servants of Allah from the Musjid”, and similar other Ahaadith on this topic, it is obvious that this permission is regulated by conditions which the Ulama have explained. These conditions have been obtained from the Ahaadith. They are: The woman must not be perfumed nor adorned with jewels which make sounds. Her garments should not be attractive. There should be no mingling with males. The woman should not be young or like a young woman who can be a cause of fitnah. There should be no fear of mischief in the road. ……..If even one of these conditions is lacking, then she will be prohibited (from going to the Musjid or anywhere else).

The condition for permissibility of emerging is the non-existence of fitnah and this is obvious. When emergence is haraam (because of fitnah), then prohibiting (women) is Waajib (on the husband or the guardian).
Furthermore, the statement of Hadhrat Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) reinforces prohibition, for she said: ‘If Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had seen what the women have introduced, he would prohibit them from the Musjid just as the women of Bani Israaeel were prohibited.’
What she (Hadhrat Aishah- radhiyallahu anha) had deducted is supported by the statement of Imaam Maalik (rahmatullah alayh), viz., ‘The fataawa (verdicts) for people will be in accordance with the immorality which they have introduced.’ The meaning of Imaam Maalik’s statement is what Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) had intended. In other words, if a person introduces such an act for which the Principles of the Shariah dictate a decree other than the decree which had existed before the innovation, then a new decree will be applied according to what has been introduced, not in accordance with what had existed prior to the introduction. ………..
This is supported by her Hadith narrated by Ibn Maajah: ‘While Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was seated in the Musjid an adorned woman entered the Musjid walking proudly showing off her beauty in the Musjid. Then said Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam): ‘O people! Forbid your women from wearing garments of beauty and from pride in the Musjid, for verily, Bani Israaeel were cursed when their women dressed beautifully and swaggered in the Musaajid.’
When a woman emerges only in this manner, she shall be prevented. …… (The prohibition) is further supported by the statement of Ghazaali in Al-Ihya. He said: ‘It is Waajib to prohibit women from attending the Musaajid for Salaat, for gatherings of knowledge and thikr when there is fear of fitnah, for verily Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) had prohibited them. It was then said to her: ‘Verily, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not prohibit women from jamaa-aat (gatherings in the Musjid).’ She then said: ‘If Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had known what the women have introduced after him, he would most certainly have prohibited them.’
The statement of Ibn Khuzaimah who is among our Akaabir (senior) Ashaab supports this: ‘The Salaat of a woman in her home is superior to her Salaat in the Musjid of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) despite it being equal to a thousand Salaat. This means the Salaat of men, not of women. Therefore, when it (her Salaat in her home) is superior (than even 1000 Salaat of men who perform in Musjid Nabawi), then the motive which brings her out of the home is either riya (show) or pride, and this is haraam.
Among the worst evils is the mingling of the ignoramuses among the masses. Men with their wives with exposed faces mix with other men during Tawaaf. Also among the evils is what the women of Makkah and others do when they intend to perform Tawaaf and enter the Musjid. They adorn themselves and use very strong perfume which can be smelt from a distance. With this they distract the attention of the people, and this constitutes a cause for attracting gazes towards them, leading to different kinds of moral corruption. We supplicate to Allah to guide the rulers to eradicate these evils, Aameen! Now ponder! You will find the situation categorically demanding prohibition even with regards to Tawaaf when women perpetrate acts leading to fitnah. Thus, this situation further supports what she (Hadhrat Aishah –radhiyallahu anha) had said earlier. ………. (In view of the appalling moral decadence) how can prohibiting her not be incumbent……..and how can it be said that emergence (from the home) is permissible for her. This cannot be in the Shariah.
Among the haraam acts is their (women’s) brushing against men in the Musjid and the road. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “It is better for a man to brush against a mud-soiled pig than his shoulders brushing against a woman who is not lawful for him.” Narrated by Tabaraani. ….. Therefore if you say: ‘What, do you prohibit women from the Musaajid, places of Eid Salaat and visiting the quboor besides the Qabar of Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam)? My response is: ‘How is it possible for me not to say so when there is consensus on this (prohibition) because of the non-existence of the conditions of permissibility for khurooj (i.e. emergence from the home to attend the Musjid, etc.). And that (the conditions for permissibility) during the age of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) were piety and moral purity.’
Among the Mutaqaddimeen, the two noble and illustrious Shaikhs and Imaams: Shaikh Taqiuddeen Al-Haseeni and our Shaikh Alaauddeen Muhammad Bin Muhammad Bin Muhammad Al-Najjaari –May Allah cover them with His mercy – have (also) stated this (as explained above). That which both these illustrious Shaikhs have stated is adequate for a person who abandons his desire. Some have inferred that the view of Tahreem (i.e. haraam for women to attend the Musjid) and the claim of consensus on prohibition are in conflict with the (Shaafi’) Math-hab. But it is not so. On the basis of what I explain from the kutub of the Math-hab, etc. their purpose is clarified, and it explains that there is no conflict (with the Math-hab) in what they have said.
That which they (the two illustrious Shaikhs) have said is that, verily, the Fatwa in this age is the prohibition of women’s emergence (from their homes to attend the Musjid, etc.). None, but a moron subservient to his base desires will hesitate in this (i.e. in accepting that it is prohibited for women), for verily, the ahkaam change with the changing of the people of the age. This is the correct version according to the Ulama of the Salf and Khalf of the Math-habs.
Tahaawi said that the command for their emergence was in the initial period of Islam so that the Muslims may appear large in number in the eyes of the enemies. It is mentioned in Sharh Ibn Daqeequl Eid: ‘Verily, in that time (the initial period of Islam) the people of Islam were in numerical inferiority, hence there was a need to emphasize the emergence of women and (even) the females of khudoor (young girls who remain within their homes). ….. It is mentioned in Musannaf of Ibnul Attaar that going to the Musjid in the darkness at the time of safety from harm and fitnah, was permitted during the era of Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and for a while during the time of the Sahaabah. Thereafter this (emergence from the homes to go to the Musjid) was prohibited because of the (fitnah) which women had introduced such as adornment, perfume, and their mischief with men. Then he (the Author of Musannaf) mentioned the Hadith of Aishah (radhiyallahu anha) in which appears the prohibition of females. ……………It is appropriate (i.e. necessary) for a man not to aid his wife or any woman under his jurisdiction to emerge from her home. ………. This (i.e. their attending the Musjid in the initial period of Islam) has been prohibited for other eras because in their attendance there are many acts of haraam corruption.
And, he (i.e. Imaam Ghazaali) said in Al-Ihya: ‘It is Waajib to prohibit women from attending the Musaajid for Salaat and gatherings of thikr when there is fear of fitnah. These then are the different views of the Ulama according to the changing times.
When there is the incidence of fitnah, then (their attendance) is haraam without any doubt. The meaning of fitnah is zina and its introductory steps such as looking (at females), privacy with them, touching, etc.
At the time of the prevalence of haraam acts, the correct view is absolute haraam, and a Faqeeh does not hesitate in this (i.e. in issuing the fatwa of haraam). ………………….The correct version is that the Fatwa is absolute prohibition.” (Al-Fataawal Fiqhiyatul Kubra)

It is significant that Ibn Hajar Haitami (rahmatullah alayh) has branded the rejecter of prohibition a moron (ghabi). Only morons attempt to utilize their corrupted intelligence to cancel ahkaam of the Shariah which have existed since the earliest age of Islam and which all the Authorities have confirmed.
The differences of the early Fuqaha are restricted to ‘old women’ – old grandmothers – who are beyond the age of marriage and who do not constitute fitnah for even old men. This is clearly stated in the kutub of the Shariah. As far as young, middle-aged and such old women who flaunt beauty and adornment or exercise an attraction are concerned, there is consensus of the Fuqaha of all Math-habs that it is not permissible for them to attend the Musjid. However, the moron deceptively labours to confuse people with this slight difference. After the Khairul Quroon era, the prohibition was extended to even old women because of the fitnah of the times – the fitnah of the women and the fitnah of the men.
As far as the present age – the 15th Islamic century/the 21st century of the Christian era – is concerned, immorality is total. Moral depravity, shamelessness, lewdness, abandonment of hijaab, etc. are the order of the day. Under no circumstances will it ever be permissible for women to attend the Musjid in these times. The position is worse in the Haramain Shareefain. The rulers being immoral are permitting the perpetration of immorality and fitnah right inside the sacred precincts of the Holy Musaajid. The evil is appalling, particularly during Tawaaf. The authorities have grossly failed in their obligation of maintaining strict segregation and separation of Tawaaf times for the sexes.